Friday, February 23, 2007

The Picture of Health

Poor Abe. He looks like I feel.

This is a man who saw the Civil War up close and personal. What a toll that must have taken!

I'm intrigued with this photograph. Lincoln had a tough life. It shows. Here's the black and white version of the same photo. An artist added the color.

These were taken in 1865. Below is a photo taken just two years earlier, 1863.

As you can tell, Abe never could keep that tie straight. But notice how 2 years of Civil War has aged him. Lincoln was murdered in 1865. He was 56. He had just been re-elected as President. He delivered his second inaugural speech on March 4, 1865. It was his favorite speech.

"Fondly do we hope — fervently do we pray — that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether." With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan — to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations."

On April 9, 1865 the war ended when Confederate General Lee surrendered at the Appomattox Courthouse in Virginia. By April 15th - Lincoln was dead, shot by an assassin the day before while attending a play without his main bodyguard present.

My how politicians have changed! In the early years of our country - some of society's best minds were our country's leaders. No more. And we're not better for it.

He was never the picture of health. Whatever fragility plagued him physically was made small due to his incredible mental strength. I think it's time to read some biographies on a man of conviction, courage and stamina.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

We're All Just One Event Away

Marriage changes everything. A wedding - no matter if it's simple or elaborate - is a life altering event. Our lives move from being alone to being in the closest partnership known to mankind.


The birth of a child changes everything. Husbands become fathers. Wives become mothers. Together they become parents. Their lives are forever altered.

Good things - pleasant events - often change our lives. All it takes is one event and the course of our life is changed.

Unfortunately, bad things sometimes happen. A job is lost. An illness is diagnosed. An accident occurs. Death pays a visit. Lives change. Sometimes never to be the same.

Should we live in terror that at any moment a phone could ring with news that would change us forever? Hardly. That's no way to enjoy whatever life lay ahead.

Should we live mindful that life can change - and quickly? Sure. Why not? Why not live knowing that the health we may now enjoy could soon be gone? Why not live knowing that those we love most could soon be gone from our presence? I see no downside in approaching life with the zeal or zest to make the most of today.

I've seen and heard many people talk about how their lives are altered by some catastrophe - perhaps an open heart surgery, a heart attack or some other challenge that they survived. Afterwards, they see life differently. They approach life differently. I'm sure that's not true of all of them. I do know out of shape people who suffered heart attacks - and they continue to eat what they want and live without discipline or concern. Sad. But I also know some who are never the same. You see them work hard to never take a day for granted. They now see something they never saw before. Namely, the possibility that in a flash - in one moment or event - it can all change, or be gone!

I'd like to have that fresh approach to life without suffering the disaster often necessary to bring it about. I'd like to live today with a view of importance - making the most of my life today! How?

I'm fairly gifted at asking questions. The answers don't come so easily.

Life happens. Habits take over. We carve out ruts in our lives - where we're most comfortable. Day after day we do the same, or similar, things. We eat the same things, go the same places and do the same things. I realize we can't make every single moment or every single day be completely unique. I know that's hardly possible. It's certainly isn't practical.

But can't we approach our lives in a meaningful way so we make better use of our time, and our opportunities to affect others? Surely.

God is the priority for many of us. That's as it should be. Without getting into a theological debate on what serving God is all about - suffice to say, if you believe in God and believe service to the Creator supersedes all other pursuits - then you're surely living a life that is consistent with whatever faith you hold. If you're devout, then your faith touches all other areas of your life. A life that views the prospect of heaven and hell is bound to be a different life than one that views this life as the end all, be all.

Family is certainly a priority for most of us. We have husbands or wives that we cherish (hopefully). We have sons and daughters. We have son-in-laws or daughter-in-laws. We have grandchildren. We have parents. We have grandparents. There are people in our lives who matter to us more than other people. They're closer to us. We're closer to them.

Careers matter. We want to accomplish something. We want to earn what we're worth. We want a quality of life made possible by doing the best we can where we work. It affects our life and the lives of those we love. So, we want to do the best we can by earning as much as we can - and doing meaningful work.

Recreation and entertainment matter. Often, these focus more on who we're with than in what we're doing, but sometimes we simply like to do certain things. It's rare to find somebody who so enjoys an activity that he doesn't care who he does it with though.

Our lives are complex. And complicated. It's hard to bore it down into simple terms where we can live in simple, easy ways. Life is easier than it once was - in many ways. Many years ago men had to worry mostly about finding food to eat and shelter to protect them. Not a terribly complicated life, but a really hard life. Food, clothing and shelter aren't much of a challenge of most of us. We've got those things - often nice things. Really nice.

One event changes it though. One circumstance can alter it all. Imagine the things that could happen to you right now that would forever change your life. Imagine the good things. And the bad ones. Meditate on it for awhile.

Now, ask yourself, "How should I approach life now - now that I know these things could happen?" Are there things you should do that will help propel you forward, toward those good things? Then why are you waiting? Are there things you should do that might help you avoid those bad things? Then why are you waiting? Get busy with it. Today.

Make the phone call.
Have the conversation.
Hug them. Kiss them. Tell them you love them.
Forgive them. Ask them to forgive you.
Spruce up the resume. Look for the better job.
Go to the gym. Get fit.
Eat better. Eat right.

Whatever is necessary to make today your best day possible - do it. Do it as though today may be your only chance. Because you never know.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Can NASCAR Teach The NHL Anything?

Kevin Harvick's number 29 Chevrolet moves past the number 01 Chevrolet of Mark Martin to take the checkered flag, winning the 49th Daytona 500 NASCAR Nextel Cup series race at the Daytona International Speedway in Daytona Beach, Florida. (REUTERS/Pierre Ducharme)

NASCAR is by far the best sport on television - and I'm not a NASCAR fan, really. But I watch it. The high-definition picture coupled with 90 cameras, countless reporters updating you on the action, cool graphics helped by GPS technology and participants who are always promoting the sport - it's far and away TOPS in sports television.


I wish my favorite sport of hockey would take some lessons from NASCAR. No, I don't expect or need 90 cameras. I do need high-definition. I do need a major network, or at least a more accessible network. Not VERSUS, a channel too few have. I need great announcers like Razor who make the game understandable to those who don't understand it (somebody who can sell the sport) and exciting to those of us who already love it. I need light blue ice because it will look better on TV. I need in game interaction - mic up players (Marty Turco's banter with the announcers during the All-Star Game was excellent) and coaches (yes, use the 7 second delay). I need more physical play. I need more hitting. I need more fighting so players are able to stand up for their teammates. I need goalies to have smaller pads. No, I don't need bigger goals. I need to see Sidney Crosby come to Dallas every season - along with other young, upcoming stars of the league. Fix the schedule. Fix it next season. I need a forward thinking hockey guy as the commissioner. Bettman needs to be gone after this season. A contract renewal for him will be death for the league. Gretzky is ready for that job anyway. The league needs a strong commissioner who will lead the league.

As a fan, I need so much it's almost impossible to consider hockey ever getting what the sport truly deserves. What I'd love to see is a consultation with NASCAR by NHL brass to ask them one simple question: "If you owned our sport instead of yours - what would you do?" Then listen and learn.

Go back to New York and find ways to implement immediate changes that will make the greatest game on earth grow. No, I'm not looking for NASCAR type popularity or growth. I realize everybody can drive a car and fantasize about driving fast in a race. Not everybody can ice skate or relate to playing hockey. I know there are countless dramatic differences between the two sports. My point is that stock car racing found a way to promote the sport, sell the sport and make the sport one of the greatest events each week of their season. Why can't hockey find a way to do a better job of selling the game? Why can't professional hockey learn a thing or two from NASCAR?

They can. They should. They have to do something. If they don't, the sport will never grow. They are no longer in the top 4 of major sports - were they ever? Bowling, golf, soccer are all much more popular. Bowling? Are you kidding me? The NHL can't find a way to get better ratings than bowling? Boys, it's time to fire up your Zambonis and head to Daytona Beach where the NASCAR is headquartered! NASCAR could teach the NHL plenty. The real question is, could the NHL learn anything from them?

Thursday, February 15, 2007

High-Stakes Cheating & Low Expectations

Michael Waltrip and a handful of other drivers are suffering the wrath of NASCAR's head of competition. Unlike other sports that culminate in their biggest game of the season, NASCAR begins with their biggest - the Daytona 500. So the pressure to perform is intense, right out of the gate.

NASCAR inspects each car carefully. Teams know that. You'd think they'd exercise more care, or ingenuity.
Last season Jimmie Johnson won over $7.7 million. The teams earn many millions of dollars from sponsorships. The stakes are very high for teams to qualify for each race, complete as many laps as possible, make a top ten finish, make a top three finish or win outright. Points mean dollars. Dollars come from winning. Fans buy merchandise. Sponsors dole out millions for advertising exposure. Cheating isn't surprising.

Catching it is what surprises me. NASCAR is famous for having templates that cars must fit. Specifications are precise. Angles, weights, dimensions, materials - they're all crucial. And NASCAR has figured out a way to police all this - with some certainty of success.

I'm impressed.

I'm not a rabid fan of NASCAR. I do enjoy those behind the scenes type shows about it though. I'm fascinated by the engineering, although I admit I'm much fonder of Formula 1 where real technology rules.

However, I appreciate racing and the skills required to build, tune and drive - whether it's NASCAR, Indy car or any other type of racing. Cheating exists everywhere I suppose. In every sport, racing or otherwise. As the stakes go up, cheating goes up.

NASCAR's roots date back to the days of outlaw bootleggers. And we're shocked at the low ethics of some teams? P-L-E-A-S-E. Baseball players are juicing. Bike racers are doping. Track and field athletes are, too. Football players are steroid-enhanced. And just this past week I saw a mixed martial arts bout that ended in disqualification when a fighter put a knee to the head of his opponent while they were on the ground - a violation of the rules. After he did it twice, the bout was stopped. The injured fighter was given 5 minutes to see if he could continue - another rule. When it was clear he couldn't continue, the bout was ended. The injured fighter won by way of disqualification. The offending fighter said, "I thought this was a fight." His implication was that no rules should apply, yet the opposing fighter's manager appropriately responded by pointing out that if fights we're going to include eye-gouging and other "illegal" tactics, then all the combatants should agree on that before each fight. All participants had agreed to fight by the rules - so he felt his fighter should win the fight (and he was correct). Rules are such a drag.

Cheating, lying, deception - they're just tricks of the trade, aren't they? I mean, how can you ever win if you don't cheat. Sports talk shows lament that every top college program cheats - in every major sport. True? I don't know. My beloved Sooners football program is still stinging from the Bomar scandal of last year - a car dealer paid him for work he didn't perform. On and on and on it goes.

It's like Watergate - follow the money! Where you find money, you'll likely find cheating. And sometimes you find cheating even when there is no money. Sometimes winning is enough motivation for people to cheat. After all, cheating - if you've figured out something that works and can go undetected - can be easier than working hard to prepare to win, especially when you may lack the skills of your competition.

We don't value honorable competition. We value winning.
We don't highly prize hard work. We value the top dog.
We don't value preparation. We value the person who can mount the top of the award podium.

I work out daily. Occasionally I work with a trainer employed at the gym. He admits that probably 75% of the guys - those who are really ripped - are taking steroids. While they're not competing - they are cheating. They're cheating their health. For what? Vanity. Ego. Nothing more. But those are obviously high enough stakes.

I go to work like every other responsible person. Each day I endure lying. Somebody lies to me every single day. Every single day I discover they lie. They cheat. For what? Sometimes there is a money motive, but most of the time it's pride. Ego. Vanity. Again, the stakes are evidently high enough.

Stakes are always high, if only in the mind of the cheater. Cheating is rampant. And it's growing more creative. Kudos to NASCAR for finding ways to think ahead and catch the cheaters. It probably is the only course to pursue. Legislating ethics is impossible. Holding people accountable, while more difficult, is the best means for dealing with cheaters.

Did Michael Waltrip know his team was cheating? I don't know. I don't care. He's the fat cat at the top and he deserves to answer for it. I don't care who wins the Daytona 500. I don't have a dog in that fight or a horse (car) in that race. I just don't care. I do care that daily our world is growing more acclimated to cheating of all forms. I do care that daily we're subjected to passing the buck (see Michael Waltrip's response). I do care that people refuse to do the right thing if there are any costs associated. I do care that principles mean nothing and self-interests are always being served - no matter what. The good news is that it's all quite predictable. Therefore, it ought to be easier to combat, or cope with.

So I go to work expecting people to lie to me. I talk with people knowing some, perhaps many, are trying to deceive me. I'm not jaded, or cynical (no more than is proper for somebody trying to cope with the real world). I'm realistic. And I'm no longer disappointed (very often) because my expectations are so low...especially when I know the stakes are high. Lying and cheating become more extreme as the stakes go higher. And vanity, ego and pride are high stakes.

Michael Waltrip: The Face of Guilt, Regret or
Anger That His Guys Were Stupid Enough To Get Caught?

UPDATE: Around noon today (2/15/07) Waltrip fell on the sword a bit harder and issued another apology. Seems he had to be talked into racing today by his wife and Toyota officials (a qualifying race took place today and Waltrip earned a spot in the Daytona 500). What do you bet Toyota ripped him a new one and threatened to abandon him? Guess sponsors should all have morality clauses clearly stating they can escape contractual obligations if the team is caught cheating. I could be wrong though. Read more about his apology here.


Wednesday, February 14, 2007

How To Change History

The Chicago Bears lost the Super Bowl. They'd love a "do-over." Peyton Manning's Colts don't need one. They like the history they created. The Bears can't do anything about altering the outcome of that game. It's in the books. Some history can't be changed.

There is history that can be changed though. Maybe reputation or perception is a better term than history. A person can alter the historic perception others have of them.

I've noticed a number of instances where people develop a perception based on age - and that perception or history is hard to change, even as the person grows older. A young man is hired to work for a company. He's a high school student. He has the typical flunky jobs that most high-schoolers get. He graduates and enters college. He keeps working in the company. The jobs are slightly improved, but he's not in the executive suite. He's a freshman, a sophomore and a junior. In his senior year he's now working in the office, but he's still quite a distance from the corner office. He has risen to better jobs, but many people still perceive him as the high-schooler he once was. They view him as the kid who arrived at work with the stereo blaring. Now that he's approaching college graduation they may find it almost impossible to view him differently. Can he do anything to alter that perception - that history?

We've all got history. We've all got reputations. We're all perceived in various ways. Are we forever stuck with the perception people have of us - even if they've got it all wrong?

George Bush is not the most popular guy around these days. Wars do that to perception. Will the American public always view him in the current light? Maybe. Maybe not. President Nixon left the office in a most disgraceful way. Nobody would have predicted that he'd become an influential best selling author. Nixon become a bit of a statesman. Go figure. He may be among the best examples of changing one's history. Kudos to him for finding a way out of the maze of shame. George Bush might find a similar highway. He might not.

As usual I have more questions than answers, but I know this much. We can change history if we work at it - and have patience. Nixon wasn't viewed differently over night. Slowly, he began to alter how people viewed him. Slowly, people began to listen to him. Slowly, people began to respect his opinions and views. He kept on writing. He kept on speaking. He didn't try to force it. He wasn't full of self-promotion. The public was in complete control of their perception. Had he attempted to thrust himself forward - history wouldn't have changed for him (to the extent that it did).

No, Nixon will never be remembered as favorably as he may have liked. He messed up. He was wrong. But, he certainly seemed to make the most of it after the fact. Personally, I think he was a wretched man with poor ethical standards. But I tip my hat to his efforts to recover what was left of his legacy - and name.

That high -schooler in the workplace isn't relegated to always being the 16-year-old everybody remembers. By his work he can change history. Should he continue to behave as the 16-year-old he once was - he's stuck. In the minds of his co-workers he'll remain the high school kid - even though he's now approaching college graduation.

More public figures have a tougher go of it. Nixon. Bush. Pro athletes like Terrell Owens. Living in Dallas T.O. is almost always in the news. I wonder if he'd like to alter his history. It would appear to be a very low, or non-existent priority. I conclude that because his behavior remains the same. He's still driving to work with the stereo blaring, but he wants us to think of him as something other than the high-schooler he seems to be. He can change history, but only when he changes how he acts. Sure, it would take time. But if Nixon could do it, anybody can!

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

I Can Hear You, But I Don't Have A Clue What You're Saying

Hearing isn't the same as understanding. And it doesn't matter if communication is written or verbal. Seeing the words, or hearing the words, isn't the same as understanding them.

Sometimes simple things get in the way or our understanding.

We don't understand the words. We don't know their meaning. The communicator is using terms not familiar to us. Dictionaries help. What helps more is for the speaker or writer to use words familiar to the audience.

We literally didn't hear the words, or couldn't read them. Last week I got four voice mails from an unknown number. I had no idea who called. Four voice mails failed to help because the person's voice was cutting in and out so badly you couldn't make out anything he was saying. Turns out, the person was using a Bluetooth device that wasn't working well. I couldn't hear the words, so I had no understanding.

Sometimes more difficult things get the way of our understanding. That is, the problem isn't so easily solved.

Frequently, I find myself struggling to understand somebody because they simply lack the ability to convey a clear thought. I've read written communication - repeatedly - and come to a conclusion about what is being said...only to be told that I got it all wrong. So, back I go to reread it again. And again. And I still think I had it right the first time. No. Not so. What I thought the author meant isn't what he meant at all.

Is the fault with the conveyor or the message or the recipient? Pardon me for blaming the conveyor. When people listen or read your message - and hear it or read it repeatedly before concluding the meaning --- and the meaning isn't what the conveyor wanted --- that person needs to work on their ability to convey a clear idea. Sadly, that applies to many people. And it applies to all of us from time t0 time.

Getting in the face of the recipient may not make it clearer. Rarely does it. Of course, in baseball, it proves how worked up a manager or umpire may be over a disputed call.

Getting louder doesn't work, unless of course the person failed to hear the words. It's a bit like shouting English at a person who only understands Spanish.

Going slower doesn't necessarily work. That's like speaking English very slowly to a person who only understands Spanish.

I'm convinced that some communication problems are the result of unclear thinking. Words are first formed in our head. If those words are poorly formed there - then there's little hope they'll be clearer when they leave our tongue, or our pen (or computer).

What's the problem? I have no idea really. I only find it fascinating, if not frustrating, that some people argue about what they meant when you can go back and read what they wrote, time and again, and conclude the same thing each time. They simply were unable to express their meaning, but they can tell you that you've got it all wrong.

A light bulb moment occurred when I thought, "Why don't you just say what you mean to begin with?"

For example, a person takes a position on a subject. It could be political or anything else. Pick something. Let's say a person is pro-abortion. They put forth their arguments. You conclude they're pro-abortion. You respond. Let's say you're anti-abortion. Then they wonder why you think they're pro-abortion by telling you they are not. Well, why didn't they just say that the first time? Instead they seemingly argued using all the pro-abortion arguments. That big question mark over your head signifies how confused you are. We've all had that experience.

I recently had it and finally decided I just had to tell the person that I was going to step away because I clearly lacked the ability to properly understand him. It was frustrating communication for both of us. All the more reason to just stop communicating - or whatever the exercise of futility is called. It was NOT communication. It was merely talking or typing without any purpose. My what fun that is.

Is it PC (political correctness) that is killing clear communication?
Is it our inability to understand?
Is it our inability to convey?
If so, why?

I don't know the answers really. I know whenever my communication fails it is entirely my fault. I take full responsibility for a lack of understanding on the part if the recipient. How can it be otherwise? I'm the one trying to convey the idea. If I can't clearly to do that, I have to improve.

If I'm speaking to a person who only understands Spanish I have to find someone who can help me communicate. I can't shout at the person, "Learn English." Well, I can, but it won't help things. I need an interpreter who understands both English and Spanish and somebody who can speak both languages. That will fix my problem.

If I'm writing something and people get the meaning all wrong - I can get all worked up and blame them for "misinterpreting" my meaning, but the fact is --- I need to be more clear. I need to restate my communication. Too many writers don't carefully read, and edit their words. They write and hear words in their head, but sadly those aren't always the words that make it the page or screen. They hear one thing. They write or say something different.

Speed may be partly to blame. We text message. We leave voice mails. We bang out emails. We communicate at a higher rate of speed than ever before. Perhaps that results in some half-cocked communication that isn't clearly thought out, not proof read and unedited. That is the case with me. I've carefully looked at my own failures and 100% of the time they result from too much speed, not enough thought.

Sometimes, it's okay. A quick response can be simple and easily understood. After all, "yes" is yes and "no" is no. But when lengthier explanations are required, I probably should slow down a bit and make sure the thought I want to convey is being conveyed. This week I'm hoping to make my own improvements so the recipients can save time by getting my meaning correct the first time. Perhaps by taking more time on the front end I can save all of us time on the back end.

I know I've wasted tons of time trying to figure out what somebody was trying to say. I'm tired of it.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

The Last Waltz Toward An Endless Highway

The Last Waltz was a concert by the Canadian-American rock group, The Band, held on Thanksgiving Day, November 25, 1976, at Winterland Ballroom in San Francisco. It was the "farewell" concert after 16 years of touring. The Band was joined by more than a dozen special guests, including Eric Clapton, Neil Diamond, Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell, Van Morrison, Ringo Starr, Muddy Waters and Neil Young. They had toured extensively as Bob Dylan's band.

Martin Scorsese directed and filmed the show making it into a documentary released in 1978. The film features concert performances, scenes shot on a studio soundstage and interviews by Scorsese with members of The Band.

Last week a tribute recording was released, Endless Highway. It's been 30 years since the Last Waltz. The Band launched a modern movement toward Americana music. Ironic, since 3 of the 4 members were Canucks. I loved their music as a teenager. I love it now as old guy. Despite the few morons who ripped it on Amazon, I find this tribute sensational. It's nice to hear modern artists perform these songs. Those who rip the new recording make no sense to me - if you want to hear the originals, listen to them. They've been around for decades. It's nice to hear newer artists perform them and hopefully expose more kids to music they might not otherwise give a chance.

I'm a fan of most of the artists on this new record, but admittedly I'm most fond of My Morning Jacket's rendition of "Makes No Difference." My Morning Jacket, a Kentucky band, may find a bit of commercial success now. I've been a fan for awhile, and now maybe others will give them a listen, too. (A relatively new double live CD has been released, Okonokos. Usually, double live CD's mean the band is dead - or dying. I hope that's not the case with these guys.)

Go rent The Last Waltz, or buy it. It's a concert that is older than many of you. The music is great, the performances are classic and now Endless Highway brings it all back for us old fogies to remember.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Hondajet = Sky King

Hondajet is a forthcoming product (scheduled for 2010) of Honda Aircraft Company based in Greenboro, NC. Today, the company announced a $100 million investment will be made in the new facility. Almost 300 new jobs with an average pay of $70K will be created over the next five years.

The product is an executive jet capable of seating 6 with a top cruising speed of 420 knots and a range of 1180 miles. It will also have a fuel efficiency gain over comparable jets of 30-35%. And you can have one for only $3.65 million. As of last October, well over 100 people had plopped down deposits for one. I'm sure that number is higher now.

If Honda doesn't become king of the world - Toyota will.

Famous For Nudity, Fat, Intoxication and Stupidity

Vicki Lynn Marshall, better known as Anna Nicole Smith, was a beautiful girl who wanted fame. She found it by posing nude for Playboy Magazine, after a stint as a stripper. It's the ancient story of small town girl who wants the world - and does whatever is necessary to get it. Fame found her. Why? I'm still not sure.

Her life was a public train wreck and people couldn't help but watch. I'm sure millions watched at first, because she was pretty. Later, she was a freak who had lost her beauty behind the weight she gained and drugs she abused. Misbehaving in public seemed to be a way of life for a woman who clearly wasn't terribly bright. Her lack of wisdom and knowledge, coupled with her intoxicated state, made her easy to laugh at - not with.

I was always sad for her. Sad that she wasn't smart enough to make better choices. Sad that she was a lost soul who never found her way toward mature behavior. Whatever emptiness existed in her life was never filled with food, alcohol, drugs, illicit relationships or law suits. Fame and money never filled it.

It's the sad story of a wasted life. A 5 month old little girl, the daughter she leaves behind, will grow up in the shadow of a sad figure, her own mother. What will she make of her life? What influences will exist in her life to prevent her from falling prey to the same toxic lures that captured her mom? Kids seem to follow in the path of parents, or they go in the opposite direction. I hope this child goes 180 degrees away from how Anna Nicole lived - and died.

She was 39. She was in a hotel in Hollywood, Florida. She was intoxicated. The word used to describe her physical condition seemed appropriate, "She was so wasted." Yes. Yes, she was.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Son of Bum: New Dallas Cowboys' Coach?

Bum Phillips - one time coach of the Houston Oilers from 1975-1980; coach of the New Orleans Saints from 1981 - 1985


Son of Bum, Wade Phillips - head coach of the New Orleans Saints, 1985; Denver Broncos, 1993 - 1994; Buffalo Bills, 1998 - 2000; Atlanta Falcons, 2003; lots of defensive coordinator jobs in the in between years.

Reports are running wild that today the Dallas Cowboys will introduce Son of Bum as the new coach replacing departing coach, Bill Parcells. Say it ain't so.

The town is completely underwhelmed with this news. In a word, "Boring!" Owner Jerry Jones continues to amaze the masses with his unconventional approach to operating a professional football team.

In all fairness though - it should be pointed out that Wade Phillips is highly regarded by most NFL coaches. His reputation among those in the know is quite good. Easy going, approachable, down-to-earth, likable and prepared - those are terms used by NFL people. Charlie Waters, ex- Cowboy safety and current Cowboy broadcaster, claims that Phillips is the "most liked" coach in the NFL. Waters says that Phillips is highly sought after as a coach and that most coaches seek jobs associated with him.

The question is, "Can Wade be a good head coach?" Does he have the organizational skills necessary to be a head coach. Reporters claim he'll be a good quick start coach able to find success fast. They question if he'll be able to sustain good performance over time.

Having a likable coach at Valley Ranch will be a welcomed change from Tuna. All kinds of questions remain though. Questions about T.O.'s return. Will he, or won't he? What about the other coaches? What about Romo? What about the age of the Cowboys' roster? How will they get younger? On and on it goes.

This much I know - Jerry Jones is not a boring owner. He will make efforts to do what it takes to win. It doesn't often work, but still Jerry keeps trying to recapture the lightning he had in the early days with Jimmie Johnson. History is often hard to replicate.

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Lisa Nowak, Astronut

Lisa Nowak, 43, lost her senses. She allegedly attempted to murder a woman she believed was her rival for the affections of fellow astronaut, William Oefelein. Nowak drove 900 miles from Houston to Orlando to confront Colleen Shipman. According to police, Nowak wore diapers so she could reduce stopping during the trip. She wore a wig and a trench coat. Armed with a BB gun, a steel mallet, garbage bags and pepper spray Nowak approached Ms. Shipman's car and sprayed Shipman and her car with pepper spray. Police claim Nowak intended to kill Shipman, even though she only assaulted her with pepper spray. She was charged with attempted first degree murder and released on $25,000 bail.

She's back at NASA today undergoing evaluations. Nobody is saying if part of that process involves psychological evaluation. Duh? You think?

Nowak flew on Discovery in July 2006. She is a decorated Navy pilot. Along with crew mate Stephanie Wilson, Nowak became known as a Robochick because she and Wilson were responsible for operating the robotic arm of Discovery. This is not a stupid person.

Weeks ago Nowak separated from her husband of 19 years. He works in Mission Control. They have 3 children: twin 5 year old girls and a teenage son. Sad.

Nowak's younger sister said she was stressed at the loss of 3 close friends aboard Columbia, the shuttle that exploded in 2003. Her family situation was evidently stressed, too. But who knows what she was thinking, or feeling?

So today the question is officially asked on NBC's TODAY Show - why do successful people snap?

How does a person go from astronaut to astronut? Experts are pointing to two things: desperation and lost perspective.

At some point we're all desperate. And I'm sure most of us experience a loss of perspective at various times of our life. Perhaps, it's a depth of those those things that causes a scientifically trained, mature pilot to consider it logical to don a diaper, drive 900 miles and use pepper spray on another woman because of jealousy. Go figure.

Smart people are capable of doing stupid things. I like to think I'm reasonably smart. I'm no brainiac or anything, but I'm not a moron either. How desperate would I have to be to wear a diaper for 900 miles? Forget the other stuff. Just the willingness to urinate myself (let's not consider #2) while driving about 16 hours is beyond my comprehension.

Well, perhaps in the coming days NASA will reveal some things to help us understand how this can happen. Bright people too often go crazy. Ted Bundy was a serial killer who was quite smart. Craziness doesn't require limited mental capacity.

Today, I'm feeling quite good about my life. My desperation levels are extraordinarily low compared to Ms. Nowak's. My stress isn't nearly as high as hers. And my perspective seems fine, but I'm probably in no shape to judge it properly. For all I know, I'm crazy enough to go buy a box of Depends and hit the highway.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Some Email Funnies Are Actually Funny


LETTER FROM AN IOWA FARM KID
(now at San Diego Marine Corp training camp)

Dear Ma and Pa,

I am well. Hope you are. Tell Brother Walt and Brother Elmer the Marine Corps beats working for old man Minch by a mile. Tell them to join up quick before all of the places are filled.

I was restless at first because you got to stay in bed till nearly 6 a.m. but I am getting so I like to sleep late. Tell Walt and Elmer all you do before breakfast is smooth your cot, and shine some things. No hogs to slop, feed to pitch, mash to mix, wood to split, fire to lay. Practically nothing.

Men got to shave but it is not so bad, there's warm water. Breakfast is strong on trimmings like fruit juice, cereal, eggs, bacon, etc., but kind of weak on chops, potatoes, ham, steak, fried eggplant, pie and other regular food, but tell Walt and Elmer you can always sit by the two city boys that live on coffee. Their food, plus yours, holds you until noon when you get fed again. It's no wonder these city boys can't walk much.

We go on "route marches," which the platoon sergeant says are long walks to harden us. If he thinks so, it's not my place to tell him different. A "route march" is about as far as to our mailbox at home. Then the city guys get sore feet and we all ride back in trucks.

The country is nice but awful flat The sergeant is like a school teacher. He nags a lot. The captain is like the school board. Majors and colonels just ride around and frown. They don't bother you none.

This next will kill Walt and Elmer with laughing. I keep getting medals for shooting. I don't know why. The bulls-eye is near as big as a chipmunk head and don't move, and it ain't shooting at you like the Higgett boys at home. All you got to do is lie there all comfortable and hit it. You don't even load your own cartridges. They come in boxes.

Then we have what they call hand-to-hand combat training. You get to wrestle with them city boys. I have to be real careful though, they break real easy. It ain't like fighting with that ole bull at home. I'm about the best they got in this except for that Tug Jordan from over in Silver Lake . I only beat him once. He joined up the same time as me, but I'm only 5'6" and 130 pounds and he's 6'8" and near 300 pounds dry.

Be sure to tell Walt and Elmer to hurry and join before other fellers get onto this setup and come stampeding in.

Your loving daughter,

Alice

Monday, February 05, 2007

Father-Son Love Is So Special



This past Saturday night in Malibu, California a closeness was felt between a father and his son. The father, Ryan O'Neal (65), was arrested after firing a gun in self-defense to prevent his son, Griffin (42), from taking his head off with a fireplace poker. Read the AP story as recorded in USA Today here.

Fathers and sons have such a special relationship. Fireplace pokers, guns and other weaponry are part and parcel of the love fathers and sons share. In fact, it's probably not limited to fathers and sons. Fathers and daughters can experience it. Ask Tatum O'Neal. She's gone years without speaking to her father.

This bunch knows a thing or two about alcohol and drug rehab. Seems Griffin, perhaps others, need to learn more though. The lessons don't seem to have taken well.

Lives out of control. It's more commonplace than we want to admit.

Contrast that with a book I recently began reading entitled, "The 100 Mile Walk: A Father and Son On A Quest To Find The Essence of Leadership."

Sander Flaum, dad, enjoins son, Jonathan, on a literal and figurative walk (visit their website). Here's what Amazon.com reviewer, Peter Han, has to say about the book:

"The formula sounds immediately intriguing: a 65-year-old, hard-charging executive with old-fashioned values conducts a dialogue with his 35-year-old, Zen-influenced son about what qualities define great leadership. One's a Republican, the other independent. One drives an Audi, the other a Subaru. One likes his vacations best when they involve golf in Scottsdale, while the other prefers backcountry roams in Yellowstone. Yet together, they aim to develop a common picture of the essence of leadership--agreement on what characterizes those special people that others follow--and in this engagingly written, disarmingly personal book, they do.

Co-authors Sander Flaum and his son, Jonathon Flaum, are products of different eras, and the inter-generational tension that runs through their book gives it its unique flavor. Father and son's voices alternate in The 100-Mile Walk, with the elder, Sander, typically writing first, and Jonathon presenting his own opinions next. Each shows the different influences of his generation in their exchanges about various aspects of leadership.

Sander grew up in Brooklyn, heavily influenced by the surrounding Jewish community. Inspired by a demanding, determined mother, he worked his way up a conventional career ladder, beginning at a large pharmaceutical company and then moving onto an ad agency. He displays and extols traditional virtues like hard work, determination, ambition, and the like. His son Jonathon, meanwhile, has a markedly more new-fashioned orientation, having gotten an MFA degree rather than an MBA, and referring repeatedly in the book to teachings of Zen masters. After a brief career in the arts, primarily as a playwright, Jonathon has become an executive coach with surprisingly starchy, button-downed clients.

As their backgrounds suggest, where father and son come together makes for interesting reading. The "walk" to which the book's title refers is actually a series of strolls, adding up to 100 miles, that father and son take together. In their jaunts through Manhattan; Asheville, North Carolina; New Orleans; and Columbus, Ohio, Sander and Jonathon discuss what eventually become 9 key qualities that they believe most good leaders exhibit. The 9 P's, as they refer to them, are: people, purpose, passion, performance, persistence, perspective, paranoia, principles, and practice.

The book's structure revolves around these 9 qualities, as Sander and Jonathon discuss each in turn, weave in anecdotal examples from real-life organizational leaders. The chapters then close with checklist summaries of key things for readers to remember. The lessons themselves aren't revolutionary; what's different is the thoughtful, at times intimate dialogue between a father and son, and what others might draw from it. Former astronaut and Senator John Glenn, lauds the Flaums' open, questioning tone, and their lack of dogmatism, in his Foreword: "this book does not presume answers; it asks probing questions." Those questions are indeed provocative ones, and readers ready to take an unusual walk with the Flaums will be well rewarded."

It's too early for me to tell you the book is worth reading. I'll let you know as my reading progresses. What interests me today is the contrast between one father, aged 65, and his son - and another father, also aged 65, and his son. One is firing a gun to stop his son from swinging a fireplace poker at his head. The other is walking around with his son talking about various principles of leadership and life.

The dysfunctional nature of some relationships is always amazing. How else can you explain the lure of the Jerry Springer Show or Dr. Phil? Admittedly, Dr. Phil is much smarter TV viewing, but the point is the same - these and other shows often depict people with serious relationship problems. We're often intrigued to watch people whose lives involve more craziness than our own.

I'm not yet 65, but so far - I've never fired a weapon in self-defense against any family members, including my kids. In fact, I've never fired or welded a weapon in self-defense against anybody. Well, does it count if you walk down the hall of your house in the middle of the night with an old night stick (I've never used a night stick during daylight hours so that's okay, right)? I admit I have armed myself against noises in the night, but usually I resort mostly to whistling a tune. Demons and boogers don't strike whistlers, or so I've heard. Years of practice and fear have provided me with the whistling skills of a red breasted warbler.

Back to fathers and their children - or just fathers and husbands, in general.

How can a relationship deteriorate into such a scene found at the O'Neal house on Saturday night? Well, drugs and alcohol surely have their place in such a scene, but that's not the whole story. Sadly, I'd guess you'd have to go back 40 years, give or take, to when little Griffin may have been the proverbial apple of his father's eye. Now, at age 43, Griffin is a physical threat to dad. Makes me wonder about all the years in between. That's where the secrets can be found. Those are the years where demons are born.

As a father I have often wondered what baggage I've loaded down on my kids. Time will tell. So far, I'm proud of them and I hope they're proud of me, but both are likely a greater testament to their mother than anybody. Her influence on all our lives has helped us immeasurably.

A father's love for his children is special - or should be. It should never warrant firearms or fireplace pokers. A father's love could easily warrant a 100 mile walk and lots of conversation though. I'd walk a million miles with my kids in order to learn, teach and love.

$140,000 + Two Wheels + Titanium Frame + Lots of Carbon Fiber = Death Bike For Cutie


It's an ECOSSE Moto Works, Inc. made Heretic Ti. Tell me this isn't a beast. I don't even ride motorcycles, but I'm quite impressed with this death machine - and its price - and its specs. It's got a titanium chassis, 120 cubic inches of power, 135hp engine, carbon fiber body work, carbon fiber wheels, Ohlins Suberbike Gas forks, and a six-speed overdrive transmission. Oh, and a price tag of about $140,000. You have to give them a deposit to get in line for one. Helmet and good judgment are not included.

Friday, February 02, 2007

The Super Bowl Will Not Impact My Life


I don't live in Chicago. I don't live in Indianapolis. I enjoy football and I'll be watching the game at home in high definition. I hope it's a competitive game and fun to watch. But I don't much care about the outcome. One team will hoist this trophy and it matters not which one.

I don't work in sports, much less professional football. I'm not a player, coach, scout or agent. I have no vested interest in this or any other football game. If I did, I could see how the game might impact my life.

I live in north Texas - Dallas Cowboys country. If the Cowboys were in the Super Bowl my life would still be somewhat unaffected, except for the radio talk I'd be subjected to for weeks. And I'm already subjected to that because the owner, Jerry Jones, continues to search for a coach. I agree with a local sports reporter who somewhat tongue-in-cheek suggested Jerry pick up the whistle and coach the team himself.

No, my life will be negligibly affected by this game.

All week I've listened to my favorite radio station - KTCK "The Ticket" - broadcast live from Miami. I've managed to watch in on their webcam a little bit, too. It's been an entertaining week. Super Bowl hype is grander than most. It's full throttle in every way.

But - it just won't impact my life that much. If you don't work in sports - particularly football - why would it? I'm reminded of a scene in the movie "Coach Carter" staring Samuel L. Jackson as coach Ken Carter. The wise coach is attempting to teach his urban basketball players that education is the key to their future success. They want to win the championship. He asks them, "Who won last year?" None of them know. They just know they want to win.

It proves the point - we don't long remember champions of athletic competition - or who won the Super Bowl. It just doesn't matter to most of us because it has no long lasting affect on our life. Yes, the teams are impacted. Yes, the host city - this year, it's Miami - is impacted. Media is impacted because they can sell more advertising and garner higher ratings/circulation. Advertising salespeople can earn higher commissions. I know events of this magnitude affect some lives more than others, but over time - even that impact is diminished.

On Monday morning I'll report to work as usual. Nothing will have changed. My health won't be improved by watching the athletic prowess of men half my age. My wallet won't be any fatter because I don't gamble. My wallet won't be any thinner because I don't gamble. My wife won't love me any more, or less. My children won't either.

By Tuesday morning only the two cities - Chicago and Indianapolis - will care. And within a few weeks they'll stop caring.

But for these few weeks leading up to the event - the world focuses enormous attention on a single game. A football game. Millions of dollars are being spent, invested and wagered. It's America's finest hours of entertainment. It will be watched by more people than any single event of 2007.

But it won't feed one starving child.
It won't save one lost soul.
It won't recover one wayward addict.
It won't stop a single mad bomber in Iraq from following his hatred of America.
It won't help one child learn to read.
It won't launch one child into higher education.
It won't save one dying person.

It's a powerful waste of resources, but I'll be watching. And I still don't care who wins - but I'll think of all the people who lose. This is, after all, America and people can spend their money as they like. Foolishness can rule the day (or week, or weekend). We allow foolishness in America. I'm thankful for that. But it's still tough to figure out how people place a high value on things with such a low return on investment (or expense).